NCEO Report 454
NCEO Report 454:
State Assessment Rates of Participation, Performance, and Assigned Accommodations of Students with Disabilities (2007–08 Through 2022–23)
Introduction
Each of the 50 U.S. states, along with 10 entities that receive Part B funding (e.g., American Samoa, the Bureau of Indian Education, Guam) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) send Annual Performance Reports (APRs) to the U.S. Secretary of Education. The reports include information on many topics, including:
- How many students participate in certain state tests in grades 3–8 and high school, and how they perform on those tests.
- The percentage of students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) who are assigned accommodations on those state tests.
In this report we share information on percentages of students with IEPs who:
- participated in state general assessments and alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAAS) in reading/language arts and mathematics at each tested grade,
- scored at or above the proficient level on those assessments at each grade,
- received testing accommodations in the same subjects and grades, and
- participated in the AA-AAAS of reading/language arts and mathematics across all tested grades
The data in this report cover the 2007–08 through 2022–23 school years. We focus on grades 4 and 8, and high school. Data for grades 3, 5, 6, and 7 are included in appendices:
- Appendix A: Participation
- Appendix B: Performance
- Appendix C: Accommodations
Our goal is to make historical and trend data available on how students with IEPs participate and perform in state tests in reading/language arts and mathematics. Over the years, methods for calculating participation and performance have changed somewhat. Still, the results are consistent enough to show trends. More information about the data and calculation methods can be found in the “Data Details” section.
What the Data Show
In this report we use public data on assessment participation, performance, and assigned accommodations for students in each grade 3–8 and high school. We also show data on participation in the AA-AAAS across all grades for each subject.
For each grade, we show graphs that include participation data (based on the total number of students with IEPs enrolled in each grade) and performance data (based on students with IEPs who took the assessments in each grade). We also show the percentage of students who took general assessments and were assigned accommodations each year, by grade and subject (for students with IEPs who took general assessments).
Each graph presents average data from the 50 states that provided information for that year. We also describe the range of results across the 50 states and across the 10 unique states in 2022-23. Finally, we present AA-AAAS participation rates, which are important for meeting the federal requirement that no more than 1.0% of tested students at the state level participate in the AA-AAAS.
At the end of each section, we summarize key trends over time.
Participation
Reading/Language Arts (R/LA) Participation
Grade 4 R/LA Participation. Figure 1 shows the participation rates of grade 4 students with IEPs in state R/LA assessments. Average participation rates stayed above 95% until the COVID-19 pandemic year (2019–20) when the U.S. Department of Education did not require states to give assessments. Participation dropped below 86% in 2020–21 but rose again to above 95% in both 2021–22 and 2022–23.
The range in participation across states was large each year. For example, in 2022–23 rates for the 50 states ranged from 80% to 100%, and for the 10 unique states ranged from 12% to 99%. Data were missing for one of the 50 states and one of the 10 unique states in 2022–23.
Figure 1. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 4 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 8 RLA Participation. Figure 2 shows participation rates for grade 8 students with IEPs in state R/LA assessments. These rates followed similar patterns to those seen in earlier grades (see Appendix A). Participation dropped below 76% in 2020–21 and did not return to 95% or higher in both 2021–22 and 2022–23.
The range of participation varied widely each year. For example, in 2022–23 rates for the 50 states ranged from 74% to 100%, and for the 10 unique states from 11% to 99%. Data were missing in 2022–23 for one of the 50 states but for none of the 10 unique states in 2022–23.
Figure 2. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 8 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments
High School R/LA Participation. Figure 3 shows participation rates for high school students with IEPs in state R/LA assessments. These rates followed similar patterns to those seen in earlier grades (see Appendix A). However, average rates were lower than in other grades and never reached the 95% level after dropping to 75.1% in 2020–21. Larger declines were seen in high school in both 2014–15 and 2020–21.
In 2022–23, participation rates ranged from 66% to 100% for the 50 states and from 9% to 97% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022-23 for one of the 50 states but for none of the 10 unique states.
Figure 3. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in High School Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Reading/Language Arts Participation Summary
Across all grades and years, overall participation rates followed similar patterns (see Appendix A). One difference was that participation in high school remained lower than in other grades. A noticeable drop in participation occurred in all grades in 2014–15. This was the year when many states began using R/LA assessments based on college- and career-ready standards (Educational Testing Service [ETS], 2016; Zinth & Millard, 2015).
Mathematics Participation
Grade 4 Mathematics Participation. Figure 4 shows the participation rates of grade 4 students with IEPs in mathematics assessments. Participation rates varied across states each year. For example, average participation rates for the 50 states ranged in 2022–23 from 80% to 100%. For the 10 unique states, rates ranged from 12% to 99%. Data were missing for one of the 50 states and one of the 10 unique states.
Figure 4. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 4 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 8 Mathematics Participation. Figure 5 shows the overall participation rates of grade 8 students with IEPs in state mathematics assessments. Before 2014-15, average rates were above 95%. Participation dropped slightly below 95% in 2014-15 and 2015-16. Participation returned to 95% in 2016-17. Participation dropped below 77% in 2020–21 and did not return to 95% in both 2021–22 and 2022–23. Participation rates varied across states each year. For example, in 2022–23, the 50 states reported rates between 74% and 100%, while the 10 unique states ranged from 10% to 100%. Data were missing in 2022–23 for one of the 50 states but for none of the 10 unique states.
Figure 5. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 8 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
High School Mathematics Participation. Figure 6 shows the overall participation rates of high school students with IEPs in state mathematics assessments. Across all years, these rates were below 95%. Drops in average participation rates occurred in years similar to those seen in other grades but started from a lower level overall.
Rates varied widely among states. For example, in 2022–23, participation ranged from 39% to 100% in the 50 states and from 9% to 98% in the 10 unique states. Data were missing for two of the 50 states and none of the 10 unique states.
Figure 6. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Mathematics Assessment in High School Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Mathematics Participation Summary
Overall, participation patterns in mathematics were similar across grades and consistent with those for R/LA assessments (see Appendix A). However, high school participation rates were noticeably lower than in other grades. The most significant declines occurred in 2014–15, when many states began using college- and career-ready content standards for mathematics (ETS, 2016; Zinth & Millard, 2015), and again in 2020–21, the year after state testing was paused due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Performance
Reading/Language Arts (R/LA) Performance
Grade 4 R/LA Performance. Figure 7 shows the percentage of students with IEPs proficient on grade 4 R/LA state assessments. Across all states, the average percentage of students reaching proficiency dropped from 45% to 15% between 2007–08 and 2020–21. Since 2021–22, scores showed a slight increase. Proficiency rates varied widely across states each year. For example, in 2022-23, proficiency rates ranged from 5% to 47% for the 50 states and from 8% to 29% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for four of the 50 states and six of the 10 unique states.
Figure 7. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 4 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 8 R/LA Performance. Figure 8 presents grade 8 R/LA performance results for students with IEPs. The percentage of students reaching the proficient level declined from 37% in 2007–08 to 11% in 2020–21, followed by a slight improvement in the years after.
Proficiency rates varied widely across states within a year. For example, in 2022–23, proficiency rates varied from 5% to 37% for the 50 states and from 9% to 21% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for four of the 50 states and five of the 10 unique states.
Figure 8. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 8 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
High School R/LA Performance. Figure 9 shows the percentage of high school students with IEPs scoring at or above proficient on R/LA state assessments. Across states, proficiency rates decreased from 34% in 2007-08 to 13% in 2020–21, with a slight increase in more recent years.
Proficiency rates varied widely across states each year. For example, in 2022–23, proficient rates across states ranged from 5% to 56% for the 50 states and from 8% to 33% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for four of the 50 states and four of the 10 unique states.
Figure 9. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in High School Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Reading/Language Arts Performance Summary
Patterns of proficiency over time were similar across all grade levels (see also Appendix B). High school students generally had slightly higher average proficient rates than earlier grades, possibly because fewer high school students participated in testing.
Across all grades, a drop in R/LA performance and participation began around 2014–15, when most states introduced new R/LA assessments based on college- and career-ready standards (ETS, 2016; Zinth & Millard, 2015). Another decline occurred after 2019–20, when testing was suspended due to COVID-19.
Mathematics Performance
Grade 4 Mathematics Performance. Figure 10 shows grade 4 mathematics performance for students with IEPs. Average proficient rates across states fell from 48% in 2007–08 to 15% in 2020–21, followed by a small increase in 2021–22 and 2022–23.
Proficiency rates varied widely across states within a year. For example, in 2022–23, proficiency rates across states ranged from 9% to 42% for the 50 states and from 8% to 63% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for three of the 50 states and four of the 10 unique states.
Figure 10. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 4 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-2020 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 8 Mathematics Performance. Figure 11 presents grade 8 mathematics results for students with IEPs. Average proficient rates dropped from 31% in 2007–08 to 8% in 2020–21, followed by a slight increase in 2021–22 and 2022–23.
Proficiency rates varied widely across states within a year. For example, in 2022–23, rates across states ranged from 3% to 36% for the 50 states and from about 6% to 21% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for three of the 50 states and five of the 10 unique states
Figure 11. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 8 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
High School Mathematics Performance. Figure 12 shows high school mathematics performance for students with IEPs. Average proficient rates declined from about 28% in 2007–08 to about 9% in 2022–23.
Proficiency rates varied widely across states within a year. For example, in 2022–23, proficient rates across states ranged from 2% to 30% for the 50 states and from 2% to 64% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for four of the 50 states and three of the 10 unique states.
Figure 12. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Mathematics Assessment in High School Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-2020 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Mathematics Performance Summary
Patterns of proficient rates across years were similar across grades, but noticeably lower in high school compared to R/LA (see also Appendix B).
In all grades, there was a dip in performance (as well as in participation) starting in 2014–15 when most states were implementing mathematics assessments based on college-and-career-ready content standards (ETS, 2016; Zinth & Millard, 2015).
Accommodations
Reading/Language Arts (R/LA) Accommodations
Grade 4 R/LA Accommodations. The average percentage of grade 4 students with IEPs assigned accommodations on general R/LA assessments was about 60% until 2014–15. After that year, the average across all states dropped to about 50% (see Figure 13).
Rates varied widely among states each year. For example, in 2022–23, the rates ranged from less than 1% to 93% for the 50 states and from 46% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for two of the 50 states and four of the 10 unique states.
Figure 13. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Reading/Language Arts Assessments in Grade 4 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 8 R/LA Accommodations. The percentage of grade 8 students with IEPs assigned accommodations on general R/LA assessments across years was similar to rates in grade 4. About 60% of students were assigned accommodations until 2014–15, when the rate dropped slightly to 55% (see Figure 14).
As with other grades, there were large differences among states each year. For example, in 2022–23 rates varied from less than 1% to 96% for the 50 states and from 52% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for one of the 50 states and one of the 10 unique states.
Figure 14. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Reading/Language Arts Assessments in Grade 8 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
High School R/LA Accommodations. The percentage of high school students with IEPs on general R/LA assessments was similar to those for earlier grades. About 55% of students were assigned accommodations until 2014–15, when the rate dropped to an average of about 52% (see Figure 15).
Rates varied widely among states each year. For example, in 2022–23, rates varied from less than 1% to 96% for the 50 states and from 40% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for one of the 50 states and for one of the 10 unique states.
Figure 15. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Reading/Language Arts Assessments in High School Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
R/LA Accommodations Summary
Across grades and years, the average percentage of students with IEPs assigned accommodations was fairly consistent. The main change occurred in 2014–15, when rates dropped. This drop might be due to policy changes in which states revised their accessibility policies to include “designated supports” for all students who needed them (Larson et al., 2020). Because of this shift, many tools that were once counted as accommodations were reclassified, which possibly reduced the percentage of students with IEPs assigned official testing accommodations.
Mathematics Accommodations
Grade 4 Mathematics Accommodations. The percentage of grade 4 students with IEPs assigned accommodations on general math assessments was similar to those for R/LA. Early averages were around 60%, but they dropped below 50% in 2014–15 (see Figure 16).
Rates varied widely among states each year. For example, in 2022–23, the rates ranged from less than 1% to 93% for the 50 states and from 46% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for one of the 50 states and for two of the 10 unique states.
Figure 16. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Mathematics in Grade 4 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 8 Mathematics Accommodations. The percentage of grade 8 students with IEPs assigned accommodations on general math assessments was about 65% until 2014–15, when it dropped to an average of about 51% (see Figure 17).
Rates differed widely among states each year. For example, in 2022–23, the range was less than 1% to 96% for the 50 states and 55% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for one of the 50 states and one of the 10 unique states.
Figure 17. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Mathematics in Grade 8 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
High School Mathematics Accommodations. The percentage of high school students with IEPs assigned accommodations on general math assessments averaged about 58% until 2014–15, when it dropped to 47%, then increased over time to 55% in 2022-23 (see Figure 18). Rates varied widely among states each year. For example, in 2022–23, state rates ranged from less than 1% to 96% for the 50 states and from 41% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for two of the 50 states and for one of the 10 unique states.
Figure 18. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Mathematics in High School Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Mathematics Accommodations Summary
Overall, rates of assigned accommodations for math general assessments were similar to those for R/LA across grades and years (see also Appendix C). The most notable change occurred after 2014–15, when states revised accessibility policies and introduced designated supports for all students (Larson et al., 2020). As a result, tools that were once considered accommodations were reclassified, possibly leading to fewer students with IEPs assigned testing accommodations.
AA-AAAS Participation
Figure 19 shows the average percentage of students who took an Alternate Assessment based on Alternate Academic Achievement Standards (AA-AAAS) instead of a general assessment. These data address the federal law that no more than 1.0% of all students tested on a subject in a state may take an AA-AAAS.
Average participation rates for reading/language arts (R/LA) and mathematics were similar in most years. Rates increased slowly until 2015–16, when there was a larger increase. The increase was greater for R/LA than for mathematics. After the 2015 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which limited AA-AAAS participation to 1.0% of all tested students, average participation rates for both subjects dropped each year starting in 2016–17.
Figure 19. Average Overall Rates Across Grades of Total Tested Students Participating in AA-AAAS in Reading/Language Arts and Mathematics Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are missing because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments. Because the number of total tested students in 2022-23 was not publicly available, the percentages for that year are based on the number of students enrolled instead of the number of tested students.
Conclusions
Across years, participation and performance averages of students with IEPs were generally similar for reading/language arts (R/LA) and mathematics. However, mathematics showed larger drops in performance, especially in high school, where performance had been higher than in R/LA. In both subjects, participation and performance declined over time until 2021–22, when small increases were seen.
Two events may have influenced these participation and performance patterns:
- New assessments in 2014–15: States adopted assessments aligned with college- and career-ready standards, which led to lower participation and performance among students with IEPs.
- The COVID-19 pandemic: During 2019–20, assessments were not administered, followed by small increases in participation and performance when testing resumed.
Average state rates of students with IEPs assigned accommodations were also similar across subjects and grades. Rates stayed near 60% until 2014–15, when they dropped to about 55%. This timing matches the introduction of new accessibility policies that added designated supports—tools and features available to all students, not just those with IEPs. Many accommodations were reclassified as designated supports at that time, possibly reducing the numbers of students assigned accommodations.
Participation rates for the AA-AAAS were generally consistent between R/LA and mathematics from 2007–08 through 2022–23. Rates increased gradually until 2014–15, then rose sharply in 2015–16—especially for R/LA. Rates dropped again in 2018–19, following the enforcement of the 1.0% participation limit under the 2015 ESEA reauthorization.
Data Details
Data used in this report were from PART B IDEA section 618 Data Products: State Level Data files by the U.S, Department of Education.
For participation rates, we used the total number of students with IEPs enrolled in each subject at each grade level as the denominator. The number of students taking the state assessments in each subject and grade was the numerator.
For performance rates, we used the number of students with IEPs who participated in the assessment in each subject and grade, and received a score, as the denominator. The numerator was the number of students with IEPs who earned a proficient or above score in each subject and grade. Data in 2013-14 and 2014-15 included field-test data.
For accommodations rates, we used the number of students with IEPs who participated in the assessment in each subject and grade as the denominator. The numerator was the number of students with IEPs who were assigned one or more accommodations in each subject and grade.
For AA-AAAS participation, we used the number of students tested in each subject as the denominator. (In 2022-23, because of a lack of public data, we used the ELSi table generator to calculate the AA-AAAS participation rate based on all tested students. For high school, the average number of students across grades 9-12 from ELSi was used to represent the number of students tested at high school.) The numerator was the number of students who participated in each subject each year. This may have slightly underestimated the percentage of students participating in the AA-AAAS for 2022-23 because not all enrolled students participated in the state assessment.
For each set of data, missing data included data that were unavailable, removed because of data quality issues, or suppressed because the number of students was too small. For the 50 states, data were also considered missing if results were unavailable for both the general assessment and the AA-AAAS. This rule did not apply to the 10 unique states.
References
- ETS. (2016). The road ahead for state assessments: What the assessment consortia built, why it matters, and emerging options. http://www.ets.org/pdfs/k12/road-ahead-for-state-assessments.pdf
- Larson, E. D., Thurlow, M. L., Lazarus, S. S., & Liu, K. K. (2019). Paradigm shifts in states’ assessment accessibility policies: Addressing challenges in implementation. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 30(4), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207319848071
- Zinth, J., & Millard, M. (2015). Using assessments to inform 12-grade interventions and accelerations. ECS Education Policy Analysis. http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/01/18/05/11805.pdf
Appendix A: Assessment Participation of Students with IEPs
Reading/Language Arts (R/LA) Participation
Grade 3 R/LA Participation. Figure A-1 shows the overall R/LA assessment participation rates of students with IEPs in grade 3. In the early years, average participation rates were typically around 98% or higher. Over time, the rates dropped slightly, reaching about 96% of grade 3 students with IEPs. Each year, there were large differences among states. For example, in 2022–23, participation rates ranged from 80% to 100% for the 50 states and from 0% to 99% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for two of the 50 states and one of the 10 unique states.
Figure A-1. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 3 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 5 R/LA Participation. Figure A-2 shows the overall R/LA assessment participation rates of students with IEPs in grade 5. Average rates stayed above 95% until 2019-20, when assessments were not required because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Rates dropped below 85% in 2020–21 but returned to above 95% in both 2021–22 and 2022–23. As in other grades, participation rates varied widely among states. For example, in 2022–23, they ranged from 80% to 100% for the 50 states and from 18% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for two of the 50 states and two of the 10 unique states.
Figure A-2. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 5 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments
Grade 6 R/LA Participation. Figure A-3 shows the overall R/LA assessment participation rates of students with IEPs in grade 6. Rates remained above 95% until the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019–20. Average participation was below 80% in 2020–21 but increased to 95% in 2021–22 and above 95% in 2022–23. Large differences among states continued each year. For example, in 2022–23, participation ranged from about 77% to 100% for the 50 states and from 0% to 99% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for one of the 50 states and none of the 10 unique states.
Figure A-3. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 6 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments
Grade 7 R/LA Participation. Figure A-4 shows the overall R/LA assessment participation rates of students with IEPs in grade 7. Rates stayed above 95% until 2014–15, then dropped below 80% after the COVID-19 pandemic year when assessments were not required. Average rates were below 80% in 2020–21 and remained below 95% in 2021–22 and 2022–23. Participation rates continued to vary widely among states. For example, in 2022–23, they ranged from 77% to 100% for the 50 states and from 9% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for three of the 50 states and two of the 10 unique states.
Figure A-4. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 7 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments
Mathematics Participation
Grade 3 Mathematics Participation. Figure A-5 shows the overall mathematics assessment participation rates of students with IEPs in grade 3. In the early years, average participation rates were typically about 99%. Over time, the rates dropped slightly to around 96%. Each year, there were large differences among states. For example, in 2022–23, participation rates ranged from 79% to 100% for the 50 states and from 18% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for two of the 50 states and two of the 10 unique states.
Figure A-5. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 3 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 5 Mathematics Participation. Figure A-6 shows the overall mathematics assessment participation rates of students with IEPs in grade 5. These rates stayed above 95% except in the year following the COVID-19 pandemic when assessments were not required. Large differences were seen among states each year. For example, in 2022–23, participation rates ranged from 79% to 100% for the 50 states and from 18% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for two of the 50 states and two of the 10 unique states.
Figure A-6. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 5 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 6 Mathematics Participation. Figure A-7 shows the overall mathematics assessment participation rates of students with IEPs in grade 6. These rates remained above 95% except in the year following the COVID-19 pandemic when assessments were not required. Differences among states were large each year. For example, in 2022–23, rates ranged from 77% to 100% for the 50 states and from 0% to 99% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for two of the 50 states and none of the 10 unique states.
Figure A-7. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 6 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 7 Mathematics Participation. Figure A-8 shows the overall mathematics assessment participation rates of students with IEPs in grade 7. Rates were consistently above 95% until after 2014–15, when they dropped to about 95%. Large differences among states continued each year. For example, in 2022–23, participation ranged from 75% to 100% for the 50 states and from 9% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for one of the 50 states and two of the 10 unique states.
Figure A-8. Average Overall Participation Rates of Students with IEPs in State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 7 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Appendix B: Performance of Students with IEPs on State Assessments
Reading/Language Arts (R/LA) Performance
Grade 3 R/LA Performance. Figure B-1 shows the percentage of students with IEPs who scored at the proficient level on grade 3 R/LA assessments. Across all states, the average proficient rate decreased from 47% in 2007–08 to 16% in 2020–21, followed by a small increase in 2021–22 and 2022–23. Rates varied widely each year. For example, in 2022–23, proficient rates ranged from 7% to 41% for the 50 states and from 6% to 40% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for four of the 50 states and six of the 10 unique states.
Figure B-1. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 3 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 5 R/LA Performance. Figure B-2 shows grade 5 R/LA proficient rates for students with IEPs. Average proficient rates across all states declined from 42% in 2007–08 to 14% in 2020–21, then rose slightly in 2021–22 and 2022–23. Rates differed among states each year. For example, in 2022–23, proficiency rates ranged from 6% to 43% for the 50 states and from 8% to 24% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022-23 for five of the 50 states and six of the 10 unique states.
Figure B-2. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 5 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 6 R/LA Performance. Figure B-3 shows grade 6 R/LA proficient rates for students with IEPs. The average rate across all states fell from 39% in 2007–08 to 12% in 2020–21, with a slight increase in 2021–22 and 2022–23. Proficient rates varied across states each year. For example, in 2022–23, they ranged from 5% to 41% for the 50 states and from 5% to 40% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for three of the 50 states and three of the 10 unique states.
Figure B-3. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 6 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 7 R/LA Performance. Figure B-4 shows grade 7 R/LA proficient rates for students with IEPs. The average rate dropped from 37% in 2007–08 to 11% in 2020–21, with a small increase in 2021–22 and 2022–23. Rates differed among states each year. For example, in 2022–23, proficiency rates ranged from 5% to 29% for the 50 states and from 6% to 20% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for six of the 50 states and five of the 10 unique states.
Figure B-4. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Reading/Language Arts Assessment in Grade 7 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Mathematics Performance
Grade 3 Mathematics Performance. Figure B-5 shows grade 3 mathematics proficient rates for students with IEPs. Across all states, the average proficient rate declined from 52% in 2007–08 to 17% in 2020–21, then rose slightly in 2021–22 and 2022–23. Rates varied considerably among states each year. For example, in 2022–23, proficient rates ranged from 8% to 43% for the 50 states and from 10% to 54% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for four of the 50 states and six of the 10 unique states.
Figure B-5. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 3 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 5 Mathematics Performance. Figure B-6 shows grade 5 mathematics proficiency rates for students with IEPs. Average proficient rates across all states declined from 44% in 2007–08 to 11% in 2020–21, followed by a small increase in 2021–22 and 2022–23. Rates varied by state each year. For example, in 2022–23, proficient rates ranged from 7% to 33% for the 50 states and from 7% to 32% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for five of the 50 states and four of the 10 unique states.
Figure B-6. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 5 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 6 Mathematics Performance. Figure B-7 shows grade 6 mathematics proficient rates for students with IEPs. The average rate across states decreased from 38% in 2007–08 to 9% in 2020–21, followed by a very small increase in 2021–22 and 2022–23. For example, in 2022–23, proficient rates ranged from 5% to 28% for the 50 states and from 6% to 33% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for four of the 50 states and four of the 10 unique states.
Figure B-7. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 6 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 7 Mathematics Performance. Figure B-8 shows grade 7 mathematics proficient rates for students with IEPs. The average rate dropped from 36% in 2007–08 to 8% in 2020–21, followed by a small increase in 2021–22 and 2022–23. Rates varied across states each year. For example, in 2022–23, proficient rates ranged from 4% to 34% for the 50 states and from 5% to 56% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for three of the 50 states and three of the 10 unique states.
Figure B-8. Average Overall Rates of Students with IEPs Proficient or Above on State Mathematics Assessment in Grade 7 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Appendix C: Assigned Accommodations in General Assessments for Students with IEPs
Reading/Language Arts (R/LA) Accommodations
Grade 3 R/LA Accommodations. Figure C-1 shows that rates of students with IEPs assigned accommodations for grade 3 general R/LA assessments were about 50% until 2014-15. After that, rates were closer to 45%. Rates varied widely across states each year. For example, in 2022–23, rates ranged from less than 1% to 91% for the 50 states and from 43% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for two of the 50 states and three of the 10 unique states.
Figure C-1. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Reading/Language Arts Assessments in Grade 3 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 5 R/LA Accommodations. Figure C-2 shows rates of students with IEPs assigned accommodations for grade 5 general R/LA assessments. Rates averaged about 60% until 2014–15 when they dropped to an average across states and years of about 50%. The range in rates each year across states was large. For example, in 2022–23, rates varied from less than 1% to 95% for the 50 states and from 56% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 from two of the 50 states and three of the 10 unique states.
Figure C-2. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Reading/Language Arts Assessments in Grade 5 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 6 R/LA Accommodations. Figure C-3 shows rates of students with IEPs assigned accommodations for grade 6 general R/LA assessments. Rates were about 60% until 2014–15 when they dropped to an average across all states of about 50%. The range in rates was considerable each year across states. For example, in 2022-23 rates varied from less than 1% to 96% for the 50 states and from 54% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 from one of the 50 states and two of the 10 unique states.
Figure C-3. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Reading/Language Arts Assessments in Grade 6 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 7 R/LA Accommodations. Figure C-4 shows rates of students with IEPs assigned accommodations for grade 7 general R/LA assessments. Rates were about 60% until 2014-15 when they dropped to an average across all states of just under 50%. The range in rates each year across states was considerable. For example, in 2022–23, the range was from less than 1% to 96% for the 50 states and from 55% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 from three of the 50 states and three of the 10 unique states.
Figure C-4. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Reading/Language Arts Assessments in Grade 7 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Mathematics Accommodations
Grade 3 Mathematics Accommodations. Figure C-5 shows rates of students with IEPs assigned accommodations for grade 3 general mathematics assessments. Average rates across the early years was close to 60%, dropping to below 50% in 2014–15 and following years. Rates varied greatly each year across states. For example, in 2022–23 the range was from less than 1% to 91% for the 50 states and from 44% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for one of the 50 states and for three of the 10 unique states.
Figure C-5. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Mathematics in Grade 3 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 5 Mathematics Accommodations. Figure C-6 shows rates of students with IEPs assigned accommodations for grade 5 general mathematics assessments. Rates averaged nearly 70% until 2014–15 when they dropped to be closer to 60%. The range in rates across states was large each year. For example, in 2022–23, rates varied from less than 1% to 95% for the 50 states and from 56% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for two of the 50 states and for three of the 10 unique states.
Figure C-6. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Mathematics in Grade 5 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 6 Mathematics Accommodations. Figure C-7 shows rates of students with IEPs assigned accommodations for grade 6 general mathematics assessments. Rates averaged close to 70% until 2014–15 when they dropped to be closer to 60%. The range in rates each year across states was large. For example, in 2022–23, rates varied from less than 1% to 65% for the 50 states and from 57% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for two of the 50 states and for two of the 10 unique states.
Figure C-7. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Mathematics in Grade 6 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
Grade 7 Mathematics Accommodations. Figure C-8 shows rates of students with IEPs assigned accommodations for grade 7 general mathematics assessments. Rates averaged close to 70% until 2014–15 when they dropped to be closer to 60%. The range in rates across states each year was large. For example, in 2022–23, rates varied from less than 1% to 96% for the 50 states and from 55% to 100% for the 10 unique states. Data were missing in 2022–23 for one of the 50 states and for three of the 10 unique states.
Figure C-8. Average Overall Rates of Students with Assigned Accommodations on State Mathematics in Grade 7 Across Years
Note. Data for 2019-20 are not included because, during the COVID-19 pandemic, states were not required by the U.S. Department of Education to administer state assessments.
All rights reserved. Any or all portions of this document may be reproduced without prior permission, provided the source is cited as:
Wu, Y.-C., Thurlow, M. L., Hinkle, A. R., & Liu, K. K. (2026). State assessment rates of participation, performance, and assigned accommodations of students with disabilities (2007–08 through 2022–23) (NCEO Report 454). National Center on Educational Outcomes.
The Center is supported through a Cooperative Agreement (#H326G210002) with the Research to Practice Division, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education. The Center is affiliated with the Institute on Community Integration at the College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota. Consistent with EDGAR §75.62, the contents of this report were developed under the Cooperative Agreement from the U.S. Department of Education, but do not necessarily represent the policy or opinions of the U.S. Department of Education or Offices within it. Readers should not assume endorsement by the federal government. Project Officer: Kristen Rhoads

In collaboration with:
NCEO Core Staff
Andrew R. Hinkle, Co-Director
Kristi K. Liu, Co-Director
Jessica Bowman
Gail Ghere
Linda Goldstone
Michael L. Moore
Darrell Peterson
Mari Quanbeck
Virginia A. Ressa
Kathy Strunk
Yi-Chen Wu
National Center on Educational Outcomes
University of Minnesota
2025 East River Parkway, Room 1-330
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone 612/626-1530
The University of Minnesota shall provide equal access to and opportunity in its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, gender, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
This document is available in alternative formats upon request.
NCEO is an affiliated center of the Institute on Community Integration