Accommodations Toolkit
Familiar Proctor/Test Administrator: States’ Accessibility Policies, 2023
This summary of states’ accessibility policies for familiar proctor/test administrator is part of the Accommodations Toolkit published by the National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO).[1] The toolkit also contains a summary of the research literature on familiar test proctor/test administrator.
Accessibility policies often have several tiers of accessibility features: universal features, designated features, and accommodations.[2] Figure 1 summarizes how states included familiar proctor/test administrator in their accessibility policies for students with disabilities in 2023. Figure 2 summarizes how states included familiar proctor/test administrator in their accessibility policies for English learners in 2023. Table 1 shows how familiar proctor/test administrator was included in the policies, while Table 2 contains additional details and specifications.
Table 1. Accommodations Policies for Familiar Proctor/Test Administrator by State, 2023
State | Reading/ELA/Writing | Math | Science | Notes (See Table 2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U | D | A | U | D | A | U | D | A | ||
Alabama | ||||||||||
Alaska | SD, E | SD, E | SD, E | N | ||||||
Arizona | X | X | X | N | ||||||
Arkansas | ||||||||||
California | ||||||||||
Colorado | ||||||||||
Connecticut | ||||||||||
Delaware | X | X | X | N | ||||||
District of Columbia | ||||||||||
Florida | SD, E | SD, E | SD, E | N | ||||||
Georgia | SD | SD | SD | |||||||
Hawaii | ||||||||||
Idaho | ||||||||||
Illinois | SD, E | SD, E | SD, E | N | ||||||
Indiana | ||||||||||
Iowa | ||||||||||
Kansas | ||||||||||
Kentucky | ||||||||||
Louisiana | ||||||||||
Maine | ||||||||||
Maryland | ||||||||||
Massachusetts | X | X | X | |||||||
Michigan | ||||||||||
Minnesota | ||||||||||
Mississippi | ||||||||||
Missouri | X | X | X | |||||||
Montana | ||||||||||
Nebraska | ||||||||||
Nevada | ||||||||||
New Hampshire | ||||||||||
New Jersey | ||||||||||
New Mexico | ||||||||||
New York | ||||||||||
North Carolina | ||||||||||
North Dakota | ||||||||||
Ohio | X | X | X | N | ||||||
Oklahoma | ||||||||||
Oregon | ||||||||||
Pennsylvania | ||||||||||
Rhode Island | ||||||||||
South Carolina | ||||||||||
South Dakota | ||||||||||
Tennessee | X | X | X | |||||||
Texas | ||||||||||
Utah | ||||||||||
Vermont | SD, E | SD, E | SD, E | N | ||||||
Virginia | ||||||||||
Washington | ||||||||||
West Virginia | ||||||||||
Wisconsin | ||||||||||
Wyoming | X | X | X | N | ||||||
Total | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | |
Total (English Learners) | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Note: Blank cell = no policy found
Table 2. Details and Specifications: States' Braille Accessibility Policies
State | Details/Specifications |
---|---|
Arizona | Universal Test Administration Condition (Universal Feature): Having the test administered by a familiar test administrator |
Alaska | Accommodation: Specific Test Administrator: For students who need a familiar test administrator. |
Delaware | Universal Feature: Familiar Test Administrator: The student knows the test administrator and/or interpreter and has been working with that individual throughout the school year. |
Florida | Accommodation (Students with Disabilities): Flexible Setting: A student may be administered a test in a familiar place with a test proctor present, and/or a familiar person who has been appropriately trained may administer the test. Procedures for test security must be followed and precautions taken to ensure that the test remains secure. Accommodation (English Learners): Assistance in Heritage Language: The ESOL or heritage language teacher or other trained individual familiar with the student may answer specific questions about a word or phrase in a prompt, item, or answer choice that is confusing the student because of limited English proficiency but is prohibited from giving assistance that will help the student produce, correct, or edit responses. Assistance may not be provided for words or phrases in Writing and ELA Reading passages. |
Illinois | Accommodation: In general, the administration of the assessment should not be the first occasion in which an accommodation is introduced to the student. In addition, Test Administrators administering the assessment or providing accommodations should be an education professional who is familiar with the student, and who is typically responsible for providing the accommodation in the classroom. |
Ohio | Universal Feature: Familiar Test Administrator: The student knows the test administrator and/or interpreter. Both the test administrator and the interpreter must be adults and nonrelatives of the student. |
Rhode Island | Universal Feature: Familiar Test Administrator: Someone familiar to the student who is not the classroom teacher, may administer the test. This could include a speech pathologist, TVI, etc. Anyone involved in test administration must meet all criteria to become a test administrator, sign all necessary confidentiality and security documents, and participate in all required training. |
Vermont | Accommodation: The administration of the assessment should not be the first occasion in which an accommodation is introduced to the student. In addition, Test Administrators administering the assessment or providing accommodations should be an education professional who is familiar with the student, and who is typically responsible for providing the accommodation in the classroom. |
Wyoming | Administrative Consideration (Designated Feature): Familiar Test Administrator: The student knows the test administrator and/or interpreter. |
Attribution
All rights reserved. Any or all portions of this document may be reproduced and distributed without prior permission, provided the source is cited as:
- Quanbeck, M., Holden, L., & Lazarus, S. S. (2024). Familiar proctor/test administrator: States’ accessibility policies, 2023 (NCEO Accommodations Toolkit #8b.1). National Center on Educational Outcomes.
NCEO is supported through a Cooperative Agreement (#H326G210002) with the Research to Practice Division, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education. The Center is affiliated with the Institute on Community Integration at the College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota. Consistent with EDGAR §75.62, the contents of this report were developed under the Cooperative Agreement from the U.S. Department of Education, but do not necessarily represent the policy or opinions of the U.S. Department of Education or Offices within it. Readers should not assume endorsement by the federal government. Project Officer: David Egnor